Showing posts with label shawl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shawl. Show all posts
January 28, 2016
I Think the Magical Yarn Babies Have Taken Residence in My Stash, However (The VogueKnitting Live 2016 Debrief)
Another year, another VogueKnitting Live debrief. Luckily, nothing else was going on this year behind the scenes. That also means I have no excuse for purchasing a package and spending over $100 dollars to go and spend more money. Oh well.
In General
This year was a lot saner than last year. Well, not in the amount of yarn I bought, but in what they were offering. I don't know if it's because I spend all of Sunday attending class and lecture and was distracted but both all the pretties and other people on Saturday and therefore missed the crazier stuff (well, OK, crazier than this thing:
), but it still seemed like what they were offering was rather tame.
The Class and Lecture
So, because it turns out that with VogueKnitting's price increases this year, it only cost me around $10 more to buy a class/lecture/marketplace package than buying the marketplace and class al la carte, I did so. It doesn't help that the package is called the Times Square Day Tripper Package. Because that's exactly what you want to be doing as a native New Yorker, going to Times Square. On a weekend. Where all the tourists and wonky, shady characters are. I might still be a bit sour that VogueKnitting moved to a hotel smack in the middle of Times Square, meaning I have to go through there on a weekend, but anyway...
The Lecture
I signed up for the lecture called Knit to Flatter by Amy Herzog. Now, lectures always feel a little stunted to me, but that's simply because they're only a hour long, and most of the people giving them are used to classes. This has nothing to do with this lecture in particular, by the way, it's just something I've noticed from the past two lectures after taking a lecture and a class back to back for the first time.
However, this lecture was semi-interactive and funny, and made some good points. It turns out what she was discussing (how to make a sweater that you would wear 'out to lunch with a non-knitter') is something I've already done, however, her point about fabric behavior being crucial was something I don't think I fully appreciated before. Also, the statement that (and I'm sure I'm paraphrasing a bit here) 'the yarn's not growing [when you block it]. It's not making magical yarn babies' will forever be in my vocabulary (it was also used in the context of pilling, as in 'when the sweater pills, it's not making magical yarn babies, that's material from your sweater'. I knew that, but that way of putting it is still funny).
The Class
First off, all the really interesting classes this year seemed to be scheduled for Friday, which kind of sucks. Even if I could have taken off of work (I couldn't have this year anyway because I was too busy in company-approved training on how to build iPhone apps), I wouldn't have. However, I did find a Sunday class similar to one I spotted on a Friday date at first, and that was Seams Like Surgery by John Brinegar.
The good news is that the class was good. It was well-taught and led, we laughed at jokes and, for me, I learned some decorative seams as well as how to better due mattress stitch. It turns out I've been doing it pretty well, but his way of thinking about the instructions really helps with porting the technique away from stockinette. I was immediately able to seam a garter stitch item much better afterward despite that not technically being taught. While I will say I probably could have learned most of the material off of the Internet, I still don't regret taking the class.
Fashion Shows and the Panels
Honestly, I didn't catch too many fashion shows this year, and absolutely none of the panels. Actually, I don't think they had any traditional panels this year. The had events like participating in extreme knitting! (no thanks; I like my needles smaller than I am) and...I don't remember. Anyway, I did catch part of one, and two other fashion shows and they were pretty meh. Nothing too crazy. Nothing standard or overly practical either (after all, this is a fashion show and when is fashion not overly artistic over practical), but nothing that made me go WTF?!?
If anyone from VogueKnitting is reading this, let it be known: I like the WTF?!? stuff; the best part of what makes VogueKnitting VogueKnitting was making fun of some of the stuff considered fashion.
Anyway, there was a couple of questionable items, including a really bulky garter stitch cardigan (what is it with rug-looking cartigans?):
And a very bulky, very glowing, hot pink shawl-scarf:
Otherwise it was your standard sparkly shawls and batwing sweaters that make the model look like they have short stubby arms, and as normal items that you're going to get that meet current trends. Oh well.
Purchases
Beyond my quickly-becoming-normal behavior of 'buy all the yarn for all projects I want to do now and then some!, in the early hours of being there Saturday this is the exchange I had with my mom over text:
Me: LOL I found self-striping yarn that looks like watermelon
Mom: Interesting. Are you at Vogue?
Me: Yes.
Me: Want something?
Mom: Yarn for the baby blanket pattern you sent
At this point, I'm thinking 'this is the wrong place to look for yarn for a baby blanket', but this is my mom, so...
Me: Ok, will look.
So I got stuck running around the marketplace, desperately trying to find a DK like yarn that had enough quantities to make a baby blanket. Now, there's two things about VogueKnitting that I don't know if my mom gets: 1) it's mostly mid to upper range yarn that is the type to not have dye lots and be hand-painted (oh, and good luck finding one that can be washed) and 2) there's usually limited quantities at shows.
At one point, I asked my mom what her budget for this was, because I was finding really nice superwash yarn where the vendor had multiple skeins, but it was all at least $25 dollars a pop. Her answer was '$100 or so', so that cut those out. I ended up having to get three different colors of Malabrigo Rios at the Knitty City booth of all places (I try not to spend all my money at the local yarn shop booths; I can go to them here if I want and there's other vendors you can't get anywhere else attending, but sometimes they have the right stuff when you want it), because there wasn't enough of any of the colors I liked.
I ended up sending her another pattern to consider that used three colors as well. I also ended up buying her a present:
Because the joke is funny alone, it's even funnier when carried by a crocheting dietitian.
Oh, and despite this being the wrong place to buy yarn for a baby blanket, I also bought yarn for a baby blanket. Mine costs a bit more than $100 dollars, but it was perfect and superwash, and came in bigger skeins so I didn't need as many of them and my yarn budget gives up.
Conclusion
All in all, I had fun. Sure, the fashion shows are getting boring and their free non-marketplace offerings were slim this year, but the class and lecture made up for that (despite having to pay extra for those). I really need to stop buying all the yarn, though, despite the fact that I did need a bit of it this year as I didn't have anything suitable in my stash. And I am using it now, so this isn't a 'shove in there and leave it for two years' situation. Well, maybe the yarn I bought for myself with no pattern in mind will be that, but half of it won't.
We'll see what next year brings.
Labels:
buying yarn,
cardigan,
class,
crochet,
debrief,
fashion shows,
garter stitch,
knitting,
lecture,
new york,
new york city,
shawl,
VKL,
Vogue Knitting Live,
VOGUEknitting Live,
yarn
September 6, 2015
It's Going to Be Full Of Stars
With the sucess of finally doing and finishing Xeina behind me, I decided to start another I-planned-to-do-this-and-bought-the-yarn-ages-ago project:
This is Celestarium. It's a pi shawl. Why am I doing another shawl? Well, because this one's a freaking star chart of the northern sky in knitted form.
Honestly, since this was the other yarn purchase I screwed up on and got the wrong weight for (using sport weight yarn for a fingering weight shawl...because who knew a yarn with socks in the name would be sport weight?), it may come out bigger than planned. This works because I'm not planning to wear it. If it's big enough, I'll most likely use it as a blanket, or do what my boyfriend suggests and hang it up as a wall decoration. Especially if I, um, borrow the edging pattern idea from this lovely person (I'm a sucker for infinity cables).
If you're familiar with the pattern, you might have noticed that I've adapted it a bit. I decided to not do the yarn overs that were paired with the beads. I want it to look like the sky. Let me tell you, this makes it so much simpler as well; I don't have to worry about one star over two rows, I just have to find the stitch to put the bead on.
However, I upped the complexity a bit by also deciding to the luminosity version, which is the one where someone marked all the starts by their luminosity rating so that you could use different bead sizes for each rating. But it's actually not all that complex. If you're planning to do this, here's the trick: take an couple of hours to go through the charts and color each bead by the colors in the luminosity chart (this works if your doing the different color version as well, or both). Write a chart matching color to the bead size you're using. Ta da, don't have to worry about it again:
Of course, I ran into a snag where I couldn't get enough different bead sizes to do all the luminosities. Hell, the 6/0 beads are a pain to string on the stitch with this yarn, since it's thicker, and you can only go so big. So I'm using the 6/0 beads for the lowest two luminosities, then scaling up. Also, watch out for total bead size vs hole size; I actually have to flip the 5/0 and the 4/0 mappings because while the hole is bigger in the 4/0s, the 5/0s I bought are bigger beads overall.
Despite all this, it's actually a rather simple pattern. It's mostly knit, knit, knit...place bead, knit, knit, knit... The only trick is looking at the chart and knowing where the next bead needs to be placed, which of course is easy if you put a set of stitch markers every 20 stitches in the circle, and mark where they are on the chart. This makes the thought process go: 'OK, my next bead is two stitch markers and 13 stitches away'. Boom, get there, put bead, look where next one is. And there are rows where it's mostly knits.
The only demoralizing thing is that I got this far so quickly and I'm on the second to last section, but now I'm slowing down (because pi shawl: the stitch count doubles when you double the rows). Also, looking it up? Less than 10% done, of course.
It doesn't help when this happens:
It also doesn't help that the yarn keeps dumping dye on my hands, so every time I have to put it down, I have to go wash my hands:
Yeah, I've never had a yarn do this to me. Bleed when washed? Sure, all the time. Bleed a little on my hands? Yeah, once. Make it so half my hand is discolored? Never. The color is worth it, however. It really does look like a night sky.
![]() |
| Yes, I ended up using DPNs in the beginning. It turns out while Magic Loop works for starting, it doesn't once you get a few rows in -- it puts too much pressure at the corners with only two points. |
Honestly, since this was the other yarn purchase I screwed up on and got the wrong weight for (using sport weight yarn for a fingering weight shawl...because who knew a yarn with socks in the name would be sport weight?), it may come out bigger than planned. This works because I'm not planning to wear it. If it's big enough, I'll most likely use it as a blanket, or do what my boyfriend suggests and hang it up as a wall decoration. Especially if I, um, borrow the edging pattern idea from this lovely person (I'm a sucker for infinity cables).
If you're familiar with the pattern, you might have noticed that I've adapted it a bit. I decided to not do the yarn overs that were paired with the beads. I want it to look like the sky. Let me tell you, this makes it so much simpler as well; I don't have to worry about one star over two rows, I just have to find the stitch to put the bead on.
However, I upped the complexity a bit by also deciding to the luminosity version, which is the one where someone marked all the starts by their luminosity rating so that you could use different bead sizes for each rating. But it's actually not all that complex. If you're planning to do this, here's the trick: take an couple of hours to go through the charts and color each bead by the colors in the luminosity chart (this works if your doing the different color version as well, or both). Write a chart matching color to the bead size you're using. Ta da, don't have to worry about it again:
Of course, I ran into a snag where I couldn't get enough different bead sizes to do all the luminosities. Hell, the 6/0 beads are a pain to string on the stitch with this yarn, since it's thicker, and you can only go so big. So I'm using the 6/0 beads for the lowest two luminosities, then scaling up. Also, watch out for total bead size vs hole size; I actually have to flip the 5/0 and the 4/0 mappings because while the hole is bigger in the 4/0s, the 5/0s I bought are bigger beads overall.
Despite all this, it's actually a rather simple pattern. It's mostly knit, knit, knit...place bead, knit, knit, knit... The only trick is looking at the chart and knowing where the next bead needs to be placed, which of course is easy if you put a set of stitch markers every 20 stitches in the circle, and mark where they are on the chart. This makes the thought process go: 'OK, my next bead is two stitch markers and 13 stitches away'. Boom, get there, put bead, look where next one is. And there are rows where it's mostly knits.
The only demoralizing thing is that I got this far so quickly and I'm on the second to last section, but now I'm slowing down (because pi shawl: the stitch count doubles when you double the rows). Also, looking it up? Less than 10% done, of course.
It doesn't help when this happens:
![]() |
| This is my parent's cat, Atticus. Why the cat decided to sit there when there was a whole rest of the chair available is the mystery every cat owner has. |
It also doesn't help that the yarn keeps dumping dye on my hands, so every time I have to put it down, I have to go wash my hands:
Yeah, I've never had a yarn do this to me. Bleed when washed? Sure, all the time. Bleed a little on my hands? Yeah, once. Make it so half my hand is discolored? Never. The color is worth it, however. It really does look like a night sky.
Labels:
beads,
cat,
Celestarium,
current projects,
knitting,
pi shawl,
shawl,
star chart,
stars
August 10, 2015
As it Turns Out, I Didn't Get Too Distracted (Xeina Shawl Debrief)
So I did manage to finish the Xeina Shawl this weekend:
Despite all the minor problems, I think it came out pretty decent. However, it also came out *huge*, which is completely my fault. I did a number of extra repeats in the body since I was using lighter yarn and later decided to just work the body until I ran out of one skein of the blue yarn, 13 repeats in total. Yeah, in hindsight, I probably should have done 10 or 11 repeats instead, especially since the lace border came out bigger as well (probably due to using lighter yarn...heavy lace weight blocks out lacier, it turns out:
). When I realized it was blocking out really big, I measured it, and it's 80.5 inches long, and around 20 inches deep. As a 5 foot aught woman, it means the tips of the shawl go past my knees.
Though I probably shouldn't fret about it being big. I rarely wear shawls as intended; I usually use them as coat stuffers, and having a big shawl with some cashmere content means I have a neck warmer with length to wrap it around my neck and down my coat. Or over my head and around my neck.
However, I'm still in love with the color scheme I used and how it works in this pattern, so I am a little sad this won't work so well with a dress. Not that I want to be wearing this now, with all the 85-90F degree weather we've been having here.
Ah, screw it, I'll do this properly:
The Pattern
I have little to say. It's a solid pattern that I had no issues with. All the issues I ran into were due to my misjudgement, not the pattern itself. Also, while it took me months, let me note that this was due to not having time to work on it much and the fact that I was using lighter yarn. If I had been using the sport weight yarn as intended, I could see this being a 2-3 month pattern with downtime, not a 6 month one.
The Yarn
I used Spirit Trails Fiberworks Sunna (the royal blue color) and Spirit Trails Fiberworks Nona (the darker blue). Sunna is a fingering weight and Nona is a heavy lace weight, by the way, and so not recommended for this pattern unless you're willing to do what I did, which is do more repeats and get through more repeats of the lace pattern (which, honestly, if you manage to get the right count for the lace part after adding stuff, I commend you. I didn't, and had to fudge it, then fudge it again when my first fudge was miscalculated). However, these are beautiful yarns, especially the Sunna. The Nona one unwinds a bit and sometimes sticks to itself or splits, but I find this an issue with most lace weight yarns. I have a funny feeling that the issues I had, especially with the yo and k2tog rows in the body, wouldn't have happened if I had a heavier yarn than lace weight. Such is screwing around with the yarn choices.
Two warnings though: they do grow like no body's business (shame on me for not swatching, I guess) and it bleeds:
Funny story on how I ended up with this yarn for this pattern, though. For the past two years at NYS Sheep and Wool, Spirit Trails has had this shawl as one of their display patterns, and it's still one of my favorite examples of it. When I saw it the first time I did two things: fell in love with the two-colored version of the pattern and decided that this was something I could use the Sunna I bought the first time I went to Rhinebeck for. However, because I though Spirit Trails only sold fingering weight yarn (they don't, by the way), I thought the Xeina Shawl had to be fingering weight. It was only after I had bought the Nona yarn, blinded to the pattern and finding a matching color for the Sunna I had, that I realized that Xeina was a sport weight shawl and that I now had fingering and lace weight for it. So I was determined to make it work.
Conclusion
All in all, it worked out, other than the size. And even that doesn't render it unusable. Also, now I finally have one of my big projects done. Now back to using more of my backlogged stash.
![]() |
| Its really hard to get a good picture of a large shawl |
). When I realized it was blocking out really big, I measured it, and it's 80.5 inches long, and around 20 inches deep. As a 5 foot aught woman, it means the tips of the shawl go past my knees.
Though I probably shouldn't fret about it being big. I rarely wear shawls as intended; I usually use them as coat stuffers, and having a big shawl with some cashmere content means I have a neck warmer with length to wrap it around my neck and down my coat. Or over my head and around my neck.
However, I'm still in love with the color scheme I used and how it works in this pattern, so I am a little sad this won't work so well with a dress. Not that I want to be wearing this now, with all the 85-90F degree weather we've been having here.
Ah, screw it, I'll do this properly:
The Pattern
I have little to say. It's a solid pattern that I had no issues with. All the issues I ran into were due to my misjudgement, not the pattern itself. Also, while it took me months, let me note that this was due to not having time to work on it much and the fact that I was using lighter yarn. If I had been using the sport weight yarn as intended, I could see this being a 2-3 month pattern with downtime, not a 6 month one.
The Yarn
I used Spirit Trails Fiberworks Sunna (the royal blue color) and Spirit Trails Fiberworks Nona (the darker blue). Sunna is a fingering weight and Nona is a heavy lace weight, by the way, and so not recommended for this pattern unless you're willing to do what I did, which is do more repeats and get through more repeats of the lace pattern (which, honestly, if you manage to get the right count for the lace part after adding stuff, I commend you. I didn't, and had to fudge it, then fudge it again when my first fudge was miscalculated). However, these are beautiful yarns, especially the Sunna. The Nona one unwinds a bit and sometimes sticks to itself or splits, but I find this an issue with most lace weight yarns. I have a funny feeling that the issues I had, especially with the yo and k2tog rows in the body, wouldn't have happened if I had a heavier yarn than lace weight. Such is screwing around with the yarn choices.
Two warnings though: they do grow like no body's business (shame on me for not swatching, I guess) and it bleeds:
![]() |
| Ran out of vinegar before I could completely set it as well. Will have to try again another time. |
Conclusion
All in all, it worked out, other than the size. And even that doesn't render it unusable. Also, now I finally have one of my big projects done. Now back to using more of my backlogged stash.
Labels:
bleeding yarn,
blocking,
debrief,
knitting,
lace,
shawl,
Xenia Shawl,
yarn
June 23, 2015
I Fail at Yarn Chicken
I guess this doesn't really count as yarn chicken as I actually had another skein of it, but I was hoping not to have to break into it, damnit:
That was how much farther I had to go with the royal blue color to finish the last repeat I decided to do. A measly one or so inches. But of course, since the other choice was ripping the whole last repeat of the pattern out, I did bother winding the second skein to use a tiny, little bit to finish the body.
I'm now on the border, which is a bit more fiddly:
And oh so even slower. But it's still coming along, which I guess is a good thing.
However, as it's a lace pattern and so I can't travel with it much, I've ended up knitting this as well:
A bag. Where it's obvious I got bored and changed up the pattern a couple of times. I was going for a medieval look, but the yarn I used kind of ruins that...however, that's what I had at the time, and I was playing with a concept there.
However, since I now have to carry my work phone on me for my next SCA event (yay for being the only support for my apps now), I thought I would make a new bag with the first pattern there. With better colors. Though it also turns out that all my sock and lace yarn is variegated modern stuff. Because of course it is; why else would I buy the random skein unless it was nicely colored variegated sock yarn?
Guess I know what to get at WEBS this year now.
That was how much farther I had to go with the royal blue color to finish the last repeat I decided to do. A measly one or so inches. But of course, since the other choice was ripping the whole last repeat of the pattern out, I did bother winding the second skein to use a tiny, little bit to finish the body.
I'm now on the border, which is a bit more fiddly:
And oh so even slower. But it's still coming along, which I guess is a good thing.
However, as it's a lace pattern and so I can't travel with it much, I've ended up knitting this as well:
A bag. Where it's obvious I got bored and changed up the pattern a couple of times. I was going for a medieval look, but the yarn I used kind of ruins that...however, that's what I had at the time, and I was playing with a concept there.
However, since I now have to carry my work phone on me for my next SCA event (yay for being the only support for my apps now), I thought I would make a new bag with the first pattern there. With better colors. Though it also turns out that all my sock and lace yarn is variegated modern stuff. Because of course it is; why else would I buy the random skein unless it was nicely colored variegated sock yarn?
Guess I know what to get at WEBS this year now.
Labels:
bag,
current projects,
knitting,
medieval,
projects,
SCA,
shawl,
Xenia Shawl,
yarn,
yarn chicken
July 19, 2014
Misadventures in Shawls, Part 4: For Better or Worse, It's the End of the Road
Hey, I had a productive time void for once:
I am done.
I have to say, the last chart and half the chart before were pretty fast and simple. Actually, they were so easy I went on autopilot and missed the fact that the second to last row had a double decrease. On both charts. The first I really had to hack the fix, so bad I did some weird 5 stitch increase, then had to pick up a bar from a couple rows below it on the next right side row to attempt to fill up the gap the crazy decrease had made. I was partially successful:
Unfortunately, at that point the life line was so far down I didn't want to rip it out to do it right.
Then, I missed it again with the last chart, but at least all that took was an extra row of knitting added to decrease down to where I needed to be. That did cause a gap in the beads in the top band:
Oh well.
Of course, blocking it wasn't very simple either. I'm not talking about the multitude of pins; that's to be expected. I mean that I forgot what Madelinetosh yarn loves to do:
Bleed. Two vinegar baths later, it's still bleeding but no where near as badly:
That's when I ran out of vinegar and therefore gave up. I gave it one more soap bath and took it out. Good enough.
That first picture, by the way, doesn't do it justice as to how shiny those beads can be. They gleam blue and other colors depending on the light:
That picture still doesn't do it justice, but whatever.
Part of me feels I should still do a proper debrief but...meh. I covered most of what I would put into a debrief into this post series. The only thing I can think of that I didn't mention was row 67.
Row 67 was the only row where I did it, checked my work, checked my work again, and still couldn't figure out why it was wonky because as far as I can tell, I followed the pattern right. You see, row 67 did something weird. It shifted the pattern over by a couple of stitches. It also seemed to want 8 stitches for the end of the row section, yet there were only 6 before that and 6 after. It made what I thought were small leaves look a bit more like spirals, or at least leafy blobs with something trailing off the left side. It jagged the lines of yarn-overs and stockinette sections. It looks better after blocking, but still. I don't get what happened there or if I screwed up somewhere, or the pattern was the wonky one. No one else on Ravelry who has done the pattern has mentioned it.
But oh well. I guess it worked out well enough in the end. As more than one person has said to me (and I've said to others, not that it stops me from doing the same thing), no one else notices all the mistakes you do. So while I'm beating myself up about how it's not my best effort and it's got so many mistakes in it, and it's a wedding shawl and it should be my best effort and so forth, the two people I've sent the picture to have both complemented it. One of these was the recipient. So I did something right.
I am done.
I have to say, the last chart and half the chart before were pretty fast and simple. Actually, they were so easy I went on autopilot and missed the fact that the second to last row had a double decrease. On both charts. The first I really had to hack the fix, so bad I did some weird 5 stitch increase, then had to pick up a bar from a couple rows below it on the next right side row to attempt to fill up the gap the crazy decrease had made. I was partially successful:
Unfortunately, at that point the life line was so far down I didn't want to rip it out to do it right.
Then, I missed it again with the last chart, but at least all that took was an extra row of knitting added to decrease down to where I needed to be. That did cause a gap in the beads in the top band:
Oh well.
Of course, blocking it wasn't very simple either. I'm not talking about the multitude of pins; that's to be expected. I mean that I forgot what Madelinetosh yarn loves to do:
Bleed. Two vinegar baths later, it's still bleeding but no where near as badly:
That's when I ran out of vinegar and therefore gave up. I gave it one more soap bath and took it out. Good enough.
That first picture, by the way, doesn't do it justice as to how shiny those beads can be. They gleam blue and other colors depending on the light:
That picture still doesn't do it justice, but whatever.
Part of me feels I should still do a proper debrief but...meh. I covered most of what I would put into a debrief into this post series. The only thing I can think of that I didn't mention was row 67.
Row 67 was the only row where I did it, checked my work, checked my work again, and still couldn't figure out why it was wonky because as far as I can tell, I followed the pattern right. You see, row 67 did something weird. It shifted the pattern over by a couple of stitches. It also seemed to want 8 stitches for the end of the row section, yet there were only 6 before that and 6 after. It made what I thought were small leaves look a bit more like spirals, or at least leafy blobs with something trailing off the left side. It jagged the lines of yarn-overs and stockinette sections. It looks better after blocking, but still. I don't get what happened there or if I screwed up somewhere, or the pattern was the wonky one. No one else on Ravelry who has done the pattern has mentioned it.
But oh well. I guess it worked out well enough in the end. As more than one person has said to me (and I've said to others, not that it stops me from doing the same thing), no one else notices all the mistakes you do. So while I'm beating myself up about how it's not my best effort and it's got so many mistakes in it, and it's a wedding shawl and it should be my best effort and so forth, the two people I've sent the picture to have both complemented it. One of these was the recipient. So I did something right.
Labels:
bleeding yarn,
blocking,
charts,
color bleeding,
current projects,
debrief,
hack,
hacking,
knitting,
lifeline,
Misadventures in Shawls,
mistakes,
Nymphaeum,
shawl,
wedding shawl,
wet blocking
June 22, 2014
Misadventures in Shawls, Part 3: The Pitfalls of Combined Knitting and Stitch Markers
I have to say, despite my semi-laziness in devoting time to working on this, I've gotten pretty far. Things are speeding up a bit, as I'm well into the part where there's a lot of decreasing going on:
When you hit chart C and beyond, though, it may lose stitches but it gets way more fiddly for a good section of it. Unfortunately, my tension during that part was shot to hell, and there are stitches and yarn-overs that are small, and others that are huge.
Also, I have two running problems with my stitches at the moment:
1) The markers denoting the repeats are after a purl stitch, which means my purl stitch there is waaaay to loose, as it's eating the slack going around the stitch marker (this is not the first time I've had this problem, but I haven't figured out how to correct it yet other than taking out the stitch marker, which isn't an option here):
2) My usual knitting style is a combined style. For me and many combined knitters, this means I knit 'normally', where I twist my yarn around the needle so the right leg is facing the knitter, but I purl in a manner that results in the right leg facing away from the knitter (I've talked about this before). There turns out there's one issue with that. When you yarn-over counter-clockwise after or before a stitch that was knitted or purled clockwise, the yarn-over pulls the other stitch down, and makes it really hard to find the right leg of either one.
It took me more than a few rows to realize why my stitches looked screwed up, or where my 'missing' yarn-overs went. There is several places in the shawl where I knitted the stitch wrongly by working the wrong stitch or side of the stitch. Luckily, since this always happens near a yarn-over, it just looks a bit messy and the yarn-over is a bit smaller or bigger than normal. I might have ripped it all out when I realized I had been reading those stitches wrong, but I don't have the patience or time for that at the moment.
So, how do you read this mess to work it correctly?
If you have a stitch with the right leg out before a yarn-over, you'll usually see it as this:
The first stitch you need to work is not that string that looks like a loop below the weird twist (that's the stitch below your last one), it's the outer loop tilted away from you here:
So just work that loop as instructed:
Once you drop the stitch, you should be able to see the yarn over much better:
Work it as instructed, and then you're done with that.
On the other hand...
If you have a stitch with the right leg out after the yarn-over, it'll look like this:
The yarn-over is actually the yarn bar slightly below the needle towards the knitter:
Use that loop to work as instructed:
Once you slip the yarn-over off, then the other stitch will look like a normal stitch (for combined knitters at least). Work that as instructed.
And that's it. Now, if there were some easy way to correct those darn huge purl stitches.
![]() |
| On row 81 yay. |
When you hit chart C and beyond, though, it may lose stitches but it gets way more fiddly for a good section of it. Unfortunately, my tension during that part was shot to hell, and there are stitches and yarn-overs that are small, and others that are huge.
Also, I have two running problems with my stitches at the moment:
1) The markers denoting the repeats are after a purl stitch, which means my purl stitch there is waaaay to loose, as it's eating the slack going around the stitch marker (this is not the first time I've had this problem, but I haven't figured out how to correct it yet other than taking out the stitch marker, which isn't an option here):
![]() |
| This is the back of the work, if you're wondering. |
2) My usual knitting style is a combined style. For me and many combined knitters, this means I knit 'normally', where I twist my yarn around the needle so the right leg is facing the knitter, but I purl in a manner that results in the right leg facing away from the knitter (I've talked about this before). There turns out there's one issue with that. When you yarn-over counter-clockwise after or before a stitch that was knitted or purled clockwise, the yarn-over pulls the other stitch down, and makes it really hard to find the right leg of either one.
It took me more than a few rows to realize why my stitches looked screwed up, or where my 'missing' yarn-overs went. There is several places in the shawl where I knitted the stitch wrongly by working the wrong stitch or side of the stitch. Luckily, since this always happens near a yarn-over, it just looks a bit messy and the yarn-over is a bit smaller or bigger than normal. I might have ripped it all out when I realized I had been reading those stitches wrong, but I don't have the patience or time for that at the moment.
So, how do you read this mess to work it correctly?
If you have a stitch with the right leg out before a yarn-over, you'll usually see it as this:
![]() |
| Ignore my lovely pajama pants; it might have been around midnight when I took these |
The first stitch you need to work is not that string that looks like a loop below the weird twist (that's the stitch below your last one), it's the outer loop tilted away from you here:
![]() |
| Green arrow, not the red |
![]() |
| There's the right leg... |
So just work that loop as instructed:
Once you drop the stitch, you should be able to see the yarn over much better:
Work it as instructed, and then you're done with that.
On the other hand...
If you have a stitch with the right leg out after the yarn-over, it'll look like this:
The yarn-over is actually the yarn bar slightly below the needle towards the knitter:
Use that loop to work as instructed:
Once you slip the yarn-over off, then the other stitch will look like a normal stitch (for combined knitters at least). Work that as instructed.
And that's it. Now, if there were some easy way to correct those darn huge purl stitches.
May 30, 2014
Misadventures in Shawls, Part 2: Well This isn't So Bad But it is a Snail
Now being a little more of a month into this shawl (I am including last week in that count, despite the fact that I made no progress on the shawl at all since I had to make garb instead), it's not as bad as I feared, though it is as slow as I've feared:
This pattern has two things going for it: it's not that complicated (the pattern's written and charted well to boot) and it's pretty repetitive. At least so far. Beading turns out to be easy as well; you just slide the bead onto a small crochet hook and then slide it onto the desired stitch. However, 20 repeats of lace with beads still eats time, especially at the bottom there where you had to place 2 or 3 beads a repeat for every right side row. I guess the other good thing I got going for it is that the stitch count is decreasing (you start at the bottom of the shawl).
I decided to alternate between the blue square beads (for which I ran out of rather quickly and had to go find the store I bought them from to buy four more boxes. They went fast) and the iridescent silvery round beads that I bought last. The result is not something I love 100%, but it doesn't look bad:
But this is where I have to remember that it's not for me. I don't like that the beads that stand out so much and don't quite match, but my sister's a eclectic person who loves shiny things. In one of my self-doubt moments I texted her a picture (better colored than this one) asking how she liked it and her answer was 'pretty!'. So I'm on the right track. I do have to say it's kind of grown on me at this point, though I still would have picked darker beads.
Some notes about this pattern so far:
I'm sure it'll look better when it's blocked out. And if I had a clearer picture.
| Up to row 43, woot! Though there's a lot more beads on this shawl than it looks; flash washed them out. |
This pattern has two things going for it: it's not that complicated (the pattern's written and charted well to boot) and it's pretty repetitive. At least so far. Beading turns out to be easy as well; you just slide the bead onto a small crochet hook and then slide it onto the desired stitch. However, 20 repeats of lace with beads still eats time, especially at the bottom there where you had to place 2 or 3 beads a repeat for every right side row. I guess the other good thing I got going for it is that the stitch count is decreasing (you start at the bottom of the shawl).
I decided to alternate between the blue square beads (for which I ran out of rather quickly and had to go find the store I bought them from to buy four more boxes. They went fast) and the iridescent silvery round beads that I bought last. The result is not something I love 100%, but it doesn't look bad:
| Way less yellow colored; more silvery with color accents, but you get the picture. |
But this is where I have to remember that it's not for me. I don't like that the beads that stand out so much and don't quite match, but my sister's a eclectic person who loves shiny things. In one of my self-doubt moments I texted her a picture (better colored than this one) asking how she liked it and her answer was 'pretty!'. So I'm on the right track. I do have to say it's kind of grown on me at this point, though I still would have picked darker beads.
Some notes about this pattern so far:
- The cast on for this shawl is rather interesting and I don't know if it comes from somewhere but I've never seen it before. It involves creating a crochet chain that at certain chain counts, you YO over the knitting needle to create a stitch. Row one is knitted using the YOs, with the chains hanging off like decorative eyelets:
| After the CO is done |
| What it looks like on the shawl |
I'm sure it'll look better when it's blocked out. And if I had a clearer picture.
- As I stated, pattern makes perfect sense so far.
- This is a simpler motif than my last lace shawl. Maybe it's because I have more experience under my belt that it seems like that to me, but I'm thinking this is easier. The last shawl I did I couldn't figure out the pattern for my life, but it was wall-to-wall lace with cables. This has more stockinette dead space in it. It's a lot easier to see where the lace will be going, and therefore I'm not glued to the chart.
- Which means I'm most likely faster than I was last time, but knitting 400 and something stitches of lace weight still takes 30-50 minutes for a RS and WS row.
- However, I haven't had to rip it out to a lifeline yet (note: the green-white stripes in the shawl in all the pictures...that's a lifeline. They get removed). I have had to hack fixes for a couple of mistakes, but at least I can do that in this pattern. The worst mistake so far was when I decreased one off of the center stitch of one of the repeats and didn't notice until the next RS row. I managed to drop a stitch down one side and ladder a new one up on the other side to fix the stitch count, and keep going as is. It's noticeable if you look hard enough, but the other beauty of lace weight is that each stitch is but a small dot in a sea of stitches; one being off isn't too obvious when looked at as a whole.
- The crappy part about lace weight yarn is that it's soooo thin and loves to tangle in everything. It took me a day to wind the damn thing because it didn't quite fit on my swift and managed to tangle up in itself. It could have been worse, but I now have three separate balls from one skein because there was a couple of times I had to cut the current ball off and start another to get rid of a knot that developed.
April 22, 2014
Misadventures in Shawls, Part 1: Looking for Yarn in All the Wrong Places
So, among all the many things I've been doing recently, I've planned out and have started a lace shawl.
A couple of noteworthy things about this:
You see, when you agree to attempt to first match the dress (which is a slightly off-white color), its bad. Luckily the bride-to-be then stated the preference of having the shawl match the bridesmaids dresses, which were described to me as 'similar to this dark royal blue dress I'm wearing' (which, if you've read my blog, you'll know is my favorite color). For which I was very happy because finding that color yarn shouldn't be hard, right? I buy it all the time.
A couple of things about that:
Here's the two skeins of yarn I got at the local yarn stores:
And here's the yarn on the left with it's 100% silk, same colorway counterpart:
I don't think I need to tell you that nothing pictured here looks exactly like the color in the photos. The bottom one is closer to true color, though.
Oh, and some beads:
My sister ended up liking the ones on the far left, though I liked the ones right next to it (those are the evil smaller beads). I've started using the far left ones, and also these:
Which is kind of a blend between the ones I liked and the ones she liked. I dunno if I'll still use the other ones.
And this is only the beginning. The fun didn't end there, but I'll save it for another post. I better go work on the shawl now (or, more realistically, I'll do a couple of pattern repeats and then go play Skyrim. Because nothing beats a deadline like procrastination).
A couple of noteworthy things about this:
- This is only the third shawl I've ever knitted (in the about 4 years I've been knitting), and the first one was all garter stitch so it doesn't count
- This is only the second large lace project I've ever knitted
- This is my first project with beads
- I made the last lace shawl over two years ago, and it took me six months to complete it
- The shawl is for my sister. For her wedding. In August. Which gives me four months to do it.
You see, when you agree to attempt to first match the dress (which is a slightly off-white color), its bad. Luckily the bride-to-be then stated the preference of having the shawl match the bridesmaids dresses, which were described to me as 'similar to this dark royal blue dress I'm wearing' (which, if you've read my blog, you'll know is my favorite color). For which I was very happy because finding that color yarn shouldn't be hard, right? I buy it all the time.
A couple of things about that:
- The color of the bridesmaids dress wasn't quite that dark royal blue I love, it was a medium blue that loves to change colors in different lighting (thank you to the people who suggested I could buy a swatch instead of trying to judge it on the computer screen. That seriously didn't occur to me)
- Any blue color around it loves to change colors in different lighting...including on a computer screen
- The amount of lace weight yarn I would consider 'wedding worthy' (read: has a good silk content and/or is smooth and shiny) contains a lot less variety than you'd think
- That color is hard to find in nice lace weight yarn
- Having to send back $70 dollars worth of yarn because I jumped the gun and bought it without seeing the dress at all (including computer), and it wasn't the right color (didn't help that the picture made it look darker as well). Which somehow went the way of Alaska to get back to the west coast, just making it there by the return deadline. Good old USPS.
- Having to send back another skein of yarn because it was a completely different color blue than it looked in the photo
- Running to one yarn store and finding nothing
- Running to another yarn store and coming back with a 100% wool, single-ply skein that nevertheless was at least close to the right color
- Running to a third yarn store and ending up with a nice 100% silk yarn that was a variegated...dark navy blue
- Running to a fourth yarn store and after not finding anything there yarn-wise, bought needles that I thought I'd need (turns out I had to go up a size for gauge, so no dice there either) Oh, did I mention that I don't live anywhere near a yarn store, so running involves more than one subway/bus?
- Realizing that I had bought the same brand of yarn the last two times, and if I could find the 100% yarn in the wool yarn's colorway, I'd be golden
- Finding said colorway in the silk yarn online (yes!)
- Getting it a week later to find out that...it may be the same colorway, but they were not the same color (but it's close enough to the dress so screw it)
- Went looking for beads, and when I couldn't find some that matched the yarn, bought a bunch of cordinated ones
- One, and my favorite of the bunch, of which didn't fit my smallest crochet hook, so I went to a craft store when up at my parents' house to get a smaller one...which was also too big
- Going and after checking a sewing supply store for the hook (of which, despite the type of store, they carried a lot of, just not smaller than what I already owned), buying more beads that were similar and bigger than the ones I bought...only to find a smaller crochet hook in a beading store
Here's the two skeins of yarn I got at the local yarn stores:
![]() |
| I really like the dark blue color one, but it doesn't work for this shawl |
And here's the yarn on the left with it's 100% silk, same colorway counterpart:
![]() |
| Yes, that is the same colorway, I swear. Madelinetosh's Lapis colorway in Prairie (L) and Pure Silk Lace (R) |
Oh, and some beads:
My sister ended up liking the ones on the far left, though I liked the ones right next to it (those are the evil smaller beads). I've started using the far left ones, and also these:
Which is kind of a blend between the ones I liked and the ones she liked. I dunno if I'll still use the other ones.
And this is only the beginning. The fun didn't end there, but I'll save it for another post. I better go work on the shawl now (or, more realistically, I'll do a couple of pattern repeats and then go play Skyrim. Because nothing beats a deadline like procrastination).
October 30, 2013
So I Went to Rhinebeck and Brought Back More Photos of Cats Than Yarn (Rhinebeck Debrief 2013)
I said I was going to post about Rhinebeck and...I don't know what to talk about. I re-read my post from last year and realized that my experience was pretty damn similar. I went upstate, stayed with family, went to the fair, had a fun time, and went back home. It was great but it was pretty much a repeat of last year, minus the class I took then. I didn't take a class this year, so I can't even talk about that.
So, I guess I'll just picture dump then (not that I have many good ones. I seriously have just as many pictures of cats this year, and none of the yarn):
The view from the porch of the building my sister's apartment was in (slightly north of Duchess County). Pretty leaves. Still loooove the fall upstate, though it was freezing cold both mornings (it was better during the day). Dunno what was going on at that church over there though.
The billboard on the way to the fair! They seem to use the same design every year, though this is the first time I got a picture. I shouldn't have been on 9G anyway (the billboard is at the intersection of the road from the Kingston-Rhinecliff bridge (it's also a highway, but I forgot the name) and Rt. 9G. It's meant for people coming from the bridge, which is why it's at a weird angle here) Turns out you can drive straight down Route 9 through Red Hook to the Fairgrounds. Duh. I turned in Red Hook, got on 9G, and got stuck in all the traffic coming off the bridge to the fair. Took me 30 minutes to get through it. On the other hand, when I went Sunday, there was no traffic and I got there early because I was expecting to crawl for at least 10 minutes.
I got to the fair with plenty of time though, and got to see everything this time, more than once (several times in some cases...hey, you miss stuff the first two times). Saturday was crowded (figures with all that traffic), so I did more looking than shopping that day, though my mother and I are a bad influence on each other and so we both ended up with unplanned things that Saturday (favorite quote from her this year: 'I'm buying so many things for myself this year and not for other people!' I told her that was a good thing, that she should make stuff for herself). Sunday I ran around with my sisters, and bought most of the yarn I wanted. I also convinced my poor college student of a sister that she had to buy some yarn there, he he he.
For some reason, I have no pictures of the actual fair, but a few of sheep:
...and a llama (llama llama duck. You're welcome for the earworm):
Wait, I took this bad picture of a shawl I really liked and want to knit:
I did buy yarn to do it at the fair, and by buy yarn I mean I bought a skein of heavy laceweight dark blue yarn to go with some royal blue fingering weight yarn I bought two years ago and still haven't used...for a sport weight shawl. Oops. All sorts of fail there. For some reason I thought that vendor only sold fingering weight yarn.
Of course I then went a bought what ended up being three skeins of sport weight yarn for a fingering weight shawl I've wanted to do since Phil Plait,of all people, linked to the Ravelry page for it, because of course Socks that Rock Mediumweight isn't actually standard sock weight yarn. At least that just gets you a bigger 'shawl' (it will most likely go on my wall, not get worn. It's just awesome).
And before you ask, no, I can't use the yarn I bought for the second shawl for the first and vice versa (well, I could do that first one, but I don't want to). I need a dark black-blue yarn for the second one and two different colors for the first one.
So...wait, did I mention I have tons of photos of cats? I won't derail completely so I'll just post a few that go with a story about yarn. Saturday night I spent lazing around my sister's apartment. Of course I had bought some of the yarn I bought that day (not the stuff above. Other yarn. You'll see). One of her cats (she has two) first decided it liked the yarn I was knitting with:
And then decided it wanted to get the new yarn in my bag:
And then decided that on top of my yarn and bag was a good place to sleep:
I eventually moved the yarn to the suitcase so it didn't become cat toys overnight.
On Sunday we did dinner and then I drove back to my parent's place. Since I was lazing about on Monday as well and never made it to the bus to go back to the city (took off Friday and Monday. Yay four-day weekend), I took pictures of what I bought:
...and then decided to go check out the new yarn store that opened up the next town over this year. Because Rhinebeck wasn't enough yarn. Anyway, it ended up being a pretty nice store, and I had a nice chat with the owner since I was the only one there mid-day Monday. Turns out she had organized a bus trip to Rhinebeck on Sunday, and she also had bought more yarn than she needed (her actual statement was closer to: 'I bought some yarn and then asked myself why I was buying yarn; I own a yarn store'). I also bought a skein of yarn, and signed my mother up for the mailing list because she keeps saying she's going to go check out the store and never does (I also told the owner about her so now she has no excuse).
After the yarn store, I went to a local park and took more pictures:
I also sat in the island in the middle of the lake and knitted a bit. Because why the hell not; I had an hour left on the meter for my car.
And that was my weekend at the New York State Sheep and Wool Festival. And with the cats.
Next year I'll take photos of the fair instead, I promise.
So, I guess I'll just picture dump then (not that I have many good ones. I seriously have just as many pictures of cats this year, and none of the yarn):
The view from the porch of the building my sister's apartment was in (slightly north of Duchess County). Pretty leaves. Still loooove the fall upstate, though it was freezing cold both mornings (it was better during the day). Dunno what was going on at that church over there though.
![]() |
| Crappy picture; got taken through my windshield |
I got to the fair with plenty of time though, and got to see everything this time, more than once (several times in some cases...hey, you miss stuff the first two times). Saturday was crowded (figures with all that traffic), so I did more looking than shopping that day, though my mother and I are a bad influence on each other and so we both ended up with unplanned things that Saturday (favorite quote from her this year: 'I'm buying so many things for myself this year and not for other people!' I told her that was a good thing, that she should make stuff for herself). Sunday I ran around with my sisters, and bought most of the yarn I wanted. I also convinced my poor college student of a sister that she had to buy some yarn there, he he he.
For some reason, I have no pictures of the actual fair, but a few of sheep:
...and a llama (llama llama duck. You're welcome for the earworm):
Wait, I took this bad picture of a shawl I really liked and want to knit:
I did buy yarn to do it at the fair, and by buy yarn I mean I bought a skein of heavy laceweight dark blue yarn to go with some royal blue fingering weight yarn I bought two years ago and still haven't used...for a sport weight shawl. Oops. All sorts of fail there. For some reason I thought that vendor only sold fingering weight yarn.
Of course I then went a bought what ended up being three skeins of sport weight yarn for a fingering weight shawl I've wanted to do since Phil Plait,of all people, linked to the Ravelry page for it, because of course Socks that Rock Mediumweight isn't actually standard sock weight yarn. At least that just gets you a bigger 'shawl' (it will most likely go on my wall, not get worn. It's just awesome).
And before you ask, no, I can't use the yarn I bought for the second shawl for the first and vice versa (well, I could do that first one, but I don't want to). I need a dark black-blue yarn for the second one and two different colors for the first one.
So...wait, did I mention I have tons of photos of cats? I won't derail completely so I'll just post a few that go with a story about yarn. Saturday night I spent lazing around my sister's apartment. Of course I had bought some of the yarn I bought that day (not the stuff above. Other yarn. You'll see). One of her cats (she has two) first decided it liked the yarn I was knitting with:
And then decided it wanted to get the new yarn in my bag:
And then decided that on top of my yarn and bag was a good place to sleep:
![]() |
| Yes, the socks in the bottom corner are my Crazy Purple Socks. Had to wear something I made to Rhinebeck... |
I eventually moved the yarn to the suitcase so it didn't become cat toys overnight.
On Sunday we did dinner and then I drove back to my parent's place. Since I was lazing about on Monday as well and never made it to the bus to go back to the city (took off Friday and Monday. Yay four-day weekend), I took pictures of what I bought:
![]() |
| Lots of gray and black this year |
...and then decided to go check out the new yarn store that opened up the next town over this year. Because Rhinebeck wasn't enough yarn. Anyway, it ended up being a pretty nice store, and I had a nice chat with the owner since I was the only one there mid-day Monday. Turns out she had organized a bus trip to Rhinebeck on Sunday, and she also had bought more yarn than she needed (her actual statement was closer to: 'I bought some yarn and then asked myself why I was buying yarn; I own a yarn store'). I also bought a skein of yarn, and signed my mother up for the mailing list because she keeps saying she's going to go check out the store and never does (I also told the owner about her so now she has no excuse).
After the yarn store, I went to a local park and took more pictures:
I also sat in the island in the middle of the lake and knitted a bit. Because why the hell not; I had an hour left on the meter for my car.
And that was my weekend at the New York State Sheep and Wool Festival. And with the cats.
Next year I'll take photos of the fair instead, I promise.
Labels:
2013,
cat,
cats,
crocheting,
debrief,
knitting,
new york sheep and wool festival,
NYS Sheep and Wool,
photos,
Rhinebeck,
shawl,
Sheep and Wool Festival,
stupid mistakes,
yarn,
yarn crafting
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















































