Showing posts with label Knitting_by_Structure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Knitting_by_Structure. Show all posts
February 2, 2015
The VogueKnitting Live 2015 Debrief
Oh look, I did make it to VogueKnitting Live. Barely. Only because even though everything goes wrong the weekend you plan to do something fun (and by everything I mean a burst pipe flooding kitchen of the unoccupied house I'm responsible for), I had good relatives who stepped in and took care of the stuff someone had to be there for. You know, so I wasn't out $100. Instead, I spent more money.
Anyway, I'll make this shorter and sweeter than I usually do, in the interest of time (given I'm already late to this party).
In General
Two things worked in my favor this year: I noticed that they had the guide on their website (it was linked at the bottom of a copro-spam email from them. I was lucky I noticed it) and since Rhinebeck wasn't as awesome of a time as usually, for reasons completely unrelated to Rhinebeck, I said screw it and signed up for a class and went yarn-shopping.
So, since I saw the guide way ahead of time, I found out that yes, all the fashion shows were on Saturday again and I need to go early, which I did. I actually went a bit too early; by the end of Saturday I was ready to leave and spent 30 minutes sitting on the floor waiting for my knit group. That didn't stop me from running around the marketplace on Sunday, of course.
The Class
This year I took my chances again and signed up for 'Knitting Bag of Tricks' taught by Patty Lyons.
It was way better than last year's class. The instructor taught well, including taking into consideration what we wanted to learn, while keeping control of the class and not going off the rails. While a couple of the tricks taught ended up not applying to me since the hack was 'knit combined' and I normally am a combination knitter, I learned several things I didn't even think of. Like the fact that you can cast on purl-wise using long tail cast on. Or twisting the back stitch of an standard k2tog or ssk makes it neater. Also, it turns out that she's been teaching the whole Knitting by Structure concept I though I was clever in figuring out. Guess I'm glad I didn't continue on with those posts (sorry).
I highly recommend this class, and I'm glad I just pony-ed up 90% of its cost instead of not bothering when the 50% coupon didn't show up.
Fashion Shows and the Panels
Having gone early for the fashion shows, I first was slightly disappointed. The first two shows I saw, Vogue Knitting and Classic Elite Yarns were pretty tame. Though Vogue Knitting did have these questionable items on display:
But anyway, as I got to the Rowan show, I looked at the pamphlet, realize it was full of standard boxy cut, cable laden sweaters, and skedaddled off to shop the marketplace. While seeing patterns I either kind of like or or are so far in the box it's not funny modeled isn't bad, I really go for the WTF factor. Which, when I came back in the middle of the Stephen & Steven fashion show I got it in spades:
This show made up for the last three. All the knitwear in that show was an insane conglomerate of brightly-colored sacks and scarves that served more purpose as decoration for the strutting and dancing models than anything resembling an actual outfit. Don't get me wrong, it was a fun spectacle. But it wasn't really a knitwear showcase, and I have no clue what patterns were modeled. Maybe it's was better because it didn't pretend to be one.
Which leads me to the last fashion show I saw, Koigu. This was the standard fashion show I'm used to. Some stuff that's ok, some stuff that's trying to pass itself off as a wearable item but you still wonder what went through the designers mind when she came up with that. Like the target vest:
and the knitted yoga pants that don't even look flattering on the model, and the carpet sweater:
and, to top it off, your granny's doilies turned into a dress:
Oh, VogueKnitting Live, never change.
On Sunday, I did go to see a specific panel called 'Design is a Process', which was a good look into how different designers approach designing. It really got me thinking about the designs I want to do, which is bad because I currently have absolutely no time to do them. But I bought the yarn for a couple anyway. Mission accomplished, VogueKnitting?
Purchases
So, yeah, I bought way too much yarn for myself. And some yarn for my mother and the sister who got screwed dealing with the brunt of the burst pipe crisis while I frolicked here. And some stitch markers. And a shawl pin. Also, I have no pictures of any of it as I already packed it up (well, all but the skein I'm already using).
Let's just say that I'm set for awhile in yarn. Which didn't stop me from ordering more two weekends later (one planned since I didn't find it at VogueKnitting, one because my original plan didn't work).
Conclusion
This year was a better year than last year as I got to see fashion shows and had a great class. And bought too much yarn, which is always fun. Here's to next year, where hopefully I'm not ducking around making phone calls to the insurance company and relatives on top of everything.
January 4, 2014
Knitting by Structure, Part 2: All About Stitches
Introduction
As I stated in my series introductory post, the first step in learning how to knit by stitch structure is actually learning what stitch structure is. After all, you need to know what you're aiming for before you learn how to do it.Now, this isn't going to be an in-depth look at knitted fabric and how stitches behave in it. I'll touch upon a few high-level items there, but that's not what we're really concerned about at the moment. What the student needs to get out of this is two things:
- A basic understanding on how yarn becomes stitches becomes knitted fabric, and
- The parts of a stitch, both active and in the fabric.
Fabric and Stitches
Simply put, knitted fabric is just a series of interlocked loops called stitches. This is easier pictured than described, so here's a diagram I found on Wikipedia (click to go to source):Now, this happens to be the knit side of a piece of stockinette fabric, but it all works similarly (though looks different) so I'll ignore that for now. Typical hand knitted fabric is produced by holding a set of 'active' or 'live' stitches on a needle, and using another needle to pull a piece of yarn (that is as continuous as you can make it) though the active stitch, creating a new active stitch. You then drop the old active stitch and repeat the process on the next one. What this does is what the red line above symbolizes: creates a row of stitches that is in reality a part of a piece of yarn looped through another part of the yarn to create a fabric. These stitches remain active until you either create a new stitch through that stitch, or you complete a process called binding off. To get the first set of active stitches, you complete a process called casting on. Binding off and casting on are things you'll have to learn, but they're out of scope here. The only thing you'll need to recognize with casting on is that it'll create a series of loops that you'll treat as normal stitches.
There are two major actions in hand knitting that one uses to produce a stitch, and unfortunately they're also called stitches (you'll find that there's a lot of things call stitches in knitting. They are not all the same thing). The knit stitch, as shown above, is when the working yarn is pulled through from the back to the front of the active stitch. The purl stitch, on the other hand, is when the working yarn is pulled through the front of the stitch to the back.. You might notice something here, which is basically these actions are opposite sides of the same coin. If you perform the action of a knit stitch on one side of the fabric, the stitch is a purl on the other side. If you purl it, its a knit stitch on the other side.
And this is pretty much the whole basis of knitting. Everything else is variation. For example, I mentioned that the diagram showed a piece of stockinette fabric (which is also called stockinette stitch...yeah, I know). Here's a real-life picture of it:
Look at the diagram and/or the picture. Can you figure out how the stitches build to create that? Basically, stockinette is just where you perform the knit action into another knit stitch for all the stitches (or a purl into a purl stitch, if that's what's facing you). This causes all the knit sides of the stitch to face one way and the purl sides to face the other way.
Another common fabric type is called garter stitch, and it's the opposite of stockinette in a way. Garter is produced by knitting into a purl stitch and vice versa, which creates rows of stitches that alternate which side is facing where:
Anything more complicated fabric type than this is the same way. It's just an action creating a stitch where the knit and purl sides face specific directions in a repeated manner that creates a specific looking fabric. And even if you get away from that statement with, say, cables or decreases or some such, you'll still be preforming the same action in the end to complete them. You either knit, or you purl. You may switch direction and work through different loops, work through two or more stitches (or something that isn't a stitch), swap the order of the active loops, or whatever. You still either pull the yarn through back to front, or front to back in the end.
Actually, there is one exception here. It's call a yarn-over. All a yarn-over is is an active stitch you created out of thin air with the working yarn by creating a loop without pulling it through anything. It's works the same way as any other active stitch, and has the same parts. Don't worry about it though until you get to increases or lace.
The Anatomy of a Stitch
Every stitch you create, whether it's a knit or purl stitch, has four specific parts. Let's take a stitch from that diagram above, shall we?The first two parts are that the stitch has a front and a back. The front of the stitch is the face of the stitch facing you (no matter what side of the fabric you are on...this is important. The front of the stitch is not always its knit side) when it is lying flat within the fabric and open. The back, of course, is the opposite side.
The second part is what we call the legs of the stitch. The legs are the sides of the loop:
![]() |
| Well that's not the best quality there....but you get the point |
When the stitch is active, one of these legs is also called the working leg. The working leg is the leg used to orient the needle you're putting the new stitches on. This has to do with the fact that when the stitch is active (that is, it's on a needle), the stitch doesn't lay flat and there's a needle going through the stitch.
![]() |
This sounds complicated but it's not. The rule to identifying the front side of the stitch and the working leg is thus: The working leg of the stitch is always the one closest to the needle tip, and the front of the stitch is always the side tilting towards you. In this format, this does not rely on stitch orientation or style or stitch type. For the sake of working a stitch, this also holds true if the active stitch below is twisted; that is, the stitch legs are crossed and therefore the faces of the twisted stitch is flipped in relation to what was shown above. This is because that statement isn't in relation to the stitch itself, but the knitter working the stitch.
Wait, What's Stitch Orientation Mean?
I'll cover this a bit better in the next post as it's related to knitting styles, but the stitch orientation is simply the way the active stitch is sitting on the needle. Different styles produce different orientations, but there are two main ones in use. The important part about stitch orientation that you need to know is this: stitch orientation is dictated by what direction you wrap the yarn around the needle before pulling it through the stitch. That's it.While most mechanical knitting instructions and patterns presume a certain stitch orientation, the whole point of this is that it doesn't. So don't worry about orientation for now.
Conclusion
So there you have it; the basics of how stitches work and how they create knitted fabric. If you don't take anything else away from this post before moving on, remember this:- Stitches are loops and they have a front and back as well as a left and right leg.
- Fabric is created by pulling yarn through a previously created stitch in a specific manner.
- These manners of creating a new stitch are called 'knit stitch' and 'purl stitch' (or knitting and purling).
- A knit stitch and a purl stitch are opposite sides of the same 'stitch'.
- Active stitches are the ones on the needle that have not had a stitch pulled through them yet.
- On an active stitch, one of these legs is called the working leg. It is used to guide the other needle.
- Stitch anatomy for all future instructions is based on the knitter's perspective, not the stitch's or fabric's.
- The working leg of an active stitch is always the one closer to the needle tip and the front is always tilted towards the knitter.
- Orientation is dictated by the direction you wrap your yarn to create a stitch.
January 2, 2014
Knitting by Structure, Part 1: Um...What, Now?
Well that was a break I didn't intend to happen. I'm behind on a lot of things. Not my knitting so much, but everything else...yeah. Happy New Year everyone.
Anyway, here's the start of something helpful for once. I've been meaning to do this post series for a bit, but since I'm lazy I just got around to it. Might as well actually do something useful after some radio silence.
Knitting by Structure Series: The Part Where I Discuss What I Mean By This, Why You Should Read It, and What It Will Cover
(otherwise known as Part 1 - Introduction)
If you've been around the knitting realm a bit, you've probably noticed how most instructions for knitting are set up. They usually go something like this: Step 1, do x motion. Step 2, do y motion, Step 3, Profit. That is, the instructions focus on the mechanics of the actions you need to complete. They tell you what direct to put your needle, how exactly you should hold your yarn, and wrap the yarn around the needle, and so on.
It makes the instructions simple, usually self-contained, and has a huge flaw in that it presumes one way of knitting is correct and makes the average student a slave to the instructions. Ok, maybe that's a bit harsh, but you get the point. A lot of people will read the instructions, mechanically follow them, and that's all they know. If they run into an issue, or need to do something else, they have to go off and find more instructions.
I don't mean to pass judgement on the people that do this. This is how many things are taught. It makes it easier to learn as you just have to follow the process, right? It's also how most of us will explain a new technique to other knitters...me included. It's normal.
However, I propose a different method of looking at the action of knitting. I think the focus should be on structure than the mechanics of the knitting process.
What do I mean when I say 'structure'? Well, I mean the focus should be on the why of knitting, instead of the how. That we should learn to knit by learning how a stitch works and how different actions influence it. That the act of knitting should be taught by its generic algorithm, and that style (aka, how one holds the yarn and wraps it around the needle), should not be assumed by the instructions. Make things modular; teach understanding and build up on that.
I will admit, this is a bit harder way of learning knitting. The learning curve is steeper in the beginning, and you won't be able to jump straight away to producing results. But the trade-off is that it levels out sooner. Instead of just learning a certain set of mechanics, and having to learn to troubleshoot or a different technique after you make a mistake or want to change something, you gain an understanding up-front that makes it much easier to avoid some of the common mistakes one sees when learning to knit. Or to understand enough to change things on the fly.
I will also admit that this line of thinking is a bias of mine. I currently code for a living. Condescending an activity to its essence, modularizing it so each part is semi-separated and re-useable, and building complexity on top of previous structure is good coding practice. It reduces interdependence, makes things re-usable, can save time, and absolutely saves maintenance and enhancement effort later on. And that's the beauty of this approach. You may have to put more effort in at first to understand what's going on, but later the whole arsenal of knitting techniques is open to you. To slightly extend another programming-knitting metaphor that someone else really came up with, we want to learn how to be more than compilers, reading instructions and changing them directly into fabric. We want to be able to program the instructions a bit so that when the compiler reads something that doesn't compute, we don't have to spit out an error and leave it at that.
So with that justification out of the way, the following is the outline of Learning to Knit by Structure:
Now, of course really learning this comes with practice. Mistakes will happen, something won't click for a bit, that's all normal. Learning the basics of each step is enough to go on; once a knitter starts actually knitting, they should be able to learn with action as well as theory. I know people learn differently, and they will gravitate towards what they find easiest. Which may mean that a step will be done out of order. That's ok.
However, if you want to learn this way (even if you already know how to knit), it does take one thing: eagerness to know why what happened happened, and a willingness to learn it...at least at the basic explanation level (after all, what is outlined here is skimming the surface a bit. But we do have to balance why with how, and I get that most knitters don't have time for an academic-level discussion, me included. Though if you want to go right ahead). What I mean is that you can't just want the quick fix, just looking for the detailed instructions that you will follow to produce a result. These are the people also running to someone whenthey got a virus again by downloading from a shady source a mistake occurs without even attempting to fix it. I get that you may not know off the top of your head (I don't remember much off the top of my head. That's what the Internet and books are for), but you must be willing to try and learn at least where to find the answer.
Humans are pretty smart cookies. Knitting isn't rocket science, or even programming. You got this.
Anyway, here's the start of something helpful for once. I've been meaning to do this post series for a bit, but since I'm lazy I just got around to it. Might as well actually do something useful after some radio silence.
Knitting by Structure Series: The Part Where I Discuss What I Mean By This, Why You Should Read It, and What It Will Cover
(otherwise known as Part 1 - Introduction)
If you've been around the knitting realm a bit, you've probably noticed how most instructions for knitting are set up. They usually go something like this: Step 1, do x motion. Step 2, do y motion, Step 3, Profit. That is, the instructions focus on the mechanics of the actions you need to complete. They tell you what direct to put your needle, how exactly you should hold your yarn, and wrap the yarn around the needle, and so on.
It makes the instructions simple, usually self-contained, and has a huge flaw in that it presumes one way of knitting is correct and makes the average student a slave to the instructions. Ok, maybe that's a bit harsh, but you get the point. A lot of people will read the instructions, mechanically follow them, and that's all they know. If they run into an issue, or need to do something else, they have to go off and find more instructions.
I don't mean to pass judgement on the people that do this. This is how many things are taught. It makes it easier to learn as you just have to follow the process, right? It's also how most of us will explain a new technique to other knitters...me included. It's normal.
However, I propose a different method of looking at the action of knitting. I think the focus should be on structure than the mechanics of the knitting process.
What do I mean when I say 'structure'? Well, I mean the focus should be on the why of knitting, instead of the how. That we should learn to knit by learning how a stitch works and how different actions influence it. That the act of knitting should be taught by its generic algorithm, and that style (aka, how one holds the yarn and wraps it around the needle), should not be assumed by the instructions. Make things modular; teach understanding and build up on that.
I will admit, this is a bit harder way of learning knitting. The learning curve is steeper in the beginning, and you won't be able to jump straight away to producing results. But the trade-off is that it levels out sooner. Instead of just learning a certain set of mechanics, and having to learn to troubleshoot or a different technique after you make a mistake or want to change something, you gain an understanding up-front that makes it much easier to avoid some of the common mistakes one sees when learning to knit. Or to understand enough to change things on the fly.
I will also admit that this line of thinking is a bias of mine. I currently code for a living. Condescending an activity to its essence, modularizing it so each part is semi-separated and re-useable, and building complexity on top of previous structure is good coding practice. It reduces interdependence, makes things re-usable, can save time, and absolutely saves maintenance and enhancement effort later on. And that's the beauty of this approach. You may have to put more effort in at first to understand what's going on, but later the whole arsenal of knitting techniques is open to you. To slightly extend another programming-knitting metaphor that someone else really came up with, we want to learn how to be more than compilers, reading instructions and changing them directly into fabric. We want to be able to program the instructions a bit so that when the compiler reads something that doesn't compute, we don't have to spit out an error and leave it at that.
So with that justification out of the way, the following is the outline of Learning to Knit by Structure:
- Learn the structure of a stitch. What do we mean when we say 'stitch front' or 'left leg'? How does each stitch interlock with others to form a knitted fabric?
- Become familiar with the knitting styles (this is things like English and Continental as well as Western, Eastern, and Combined). How does each direct you to hold the yarn and wrap it around the needle (at this point we are not concerned on how to actually knit and purl)?
- Learn and understand how each style effects the stitch orientation. Why do we get the same fabric using different styles? How do knitting patterns assume it works? What style do you gravitate to (at this point, you must pick a style to learn first).
- How do we knit and purl? What must we do to read the stitch and know where to put the needle and pull the yarn through? This will be presented in such a way it doesn't matter what style is being used.
- Certain things presume a specific structure and orientation in common knitting parlance. What are they? How do things such as directional decreases actually work? Twisting stitches (that is, what does 'ssk', 'k2tog', and 'tbl' really mean)?
- There are other basic techniques that don't rely as much on such presumptions, but should still be learned as a basic: other decreases such as yarn-overs, increasing, picking up stitches, casting on and binding off (these may need to be taught before step 4, at least superficially).
Now, of course really learning this comes with practice. Mistakes will happen, something won't click for a bit, that's all normal. Learning the basics of each step is enough to go on; once a knitter starts actually knitting, they should be able to learn with action as well as theory. I know people learn differently, and they will gravitate towards what they find easiest. Which may mean that a step will be done out of order. That's ok.
However, if you want to learn this way (even if you already know how to knit), it does take one thing: eagerness to know why what happened happened, and a willingness to learn it...at least at the basic explanation level (after all, what is outlined here is skimming the surface a bit. But we do have to balance why with how, and I get that most knitters don't have time for an academic-level discussion, me included. Though if you want to go right ahead). What I mean is that you can't just want the quick fix, just looking for the detailed instructions that you will follow to produce a result. These are the people also running to someone when
Humans are pretty smart cookies. Knitting isn't rocket science, or even programming. You got this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












